Current Affairs Security

Alpaca's Stranglehold on Tokenized Stocks Shows How Crypto Solved Trading and Rebuilt Banking

2026-07-26

Crypto was supposed to kill the broker. No intermediaries. No gatekeepers. Move stock between wallets in minutes, any hour of the day, fractional shares of Apple or Nvidia without touching a brokerage account. It was the dream.

Then Alpaca happened.

Alpaca holds 94% market share in tokenized US equities and ETFs, custodying over $480 million in tokenized assets. By some measurements, $1.5 billion total. Every token issued by Kraken's xStocks, Dinari, Ondo, Binance, Bybit—the entire visible market—runs through Alpaca's infrastructure. One California broker became the de facto gateway between crypto exchanges and the real stock market. The middleman didn't disappear. The middleman just moved to the custody layer.

The structure matters because it's fragile. Token holders have no voting rights, no dividends, no legal claim to the underlying shares. Their ownership is a promise—a promise held by a token issuer who holds it through Alpaca who holds it through traditional market infrastructure. The SEC flagged this in January: holders of tokenized assets face third-party bankruptcy risk that shareholders don't. They're exposed to the failure of every link in the chain.

The June SpaceX IPO test proved it. Over $1 billion in pre-IPO access was tokenized and sold—$557 million on Binance alone. When the shares failed to arrive on listing day and campaigns were cancelled, everyone got refunded. But the refund didn't obscure the real problem: a token is ultimately a promise about inventory, backed by intermediaries the holder cannot see or verify. Disintermediation at the trading layer still depends entirely on intermediation at the custody layer. The blockchain doesn't touch it.

Alpaca raised $435 million last month. That's confidence. That's also urgency. October 2026 is the date that changes everything.

The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation—the actual plumbing of Wall Street—successfully converted assets into tokens and executed real production trades on 15 July. Over 30 major firms participated: BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan. The test worked. DTCC obtained a no-action letter from the SEC to offer tokenization services for Russell 1000 stocks, ETFs, and US Treasuries.

Here's the difference that matters. DTCC tokens originate inside the system that actually records who owns what. A DTCC token carries the same voting rights, dividends, and legal ownership as the share itself. Not just economic exposure. Full ownership. The same protections you get holding the physical certificate.

The largest institutions have deliberately avoided third-party tokenized stocks because of custody and counterparty risk. They've been waiting for this. When DTCC's service goes live commercially, every bank and fund will have direct access to official, rights-carrying tokens. The competitive landscape collapses.

Alpaca's own framing offers no escape hatch. The company notes it was among the 50-plus firms that designed the DTCC service and participated in July's test. Alpaca claims that DTCC supplies settlement while broker functions like clearing and margin stay broker business. Even if true—and it probably is—every DTC participant gains the same access Alpaca now holds exclusively. Two distinct markets could emerge: official tokens serving regulated institutions, third-party tokens serving everyone else.

Tokenized stocks achieved genuine decentralization at the trading layer. They rebuilt banking at the custody layer. Alpaca built that layer, shaped the rules meant to displace it, and now faces the question of whether October entrench its dominance or eliminate it entirely.

Source & further reading:

Sources